IMHO I don't believe it's fair at all... I think it should be scored on the merits of this museum and only this museum. Sadly in our world, there is much bigotry, hatred, ignorance intolerance and racism. Museums like this are a way to educate people about what had happened and hopefully by teaching people about the horrors that humans inflicted upon each other it will prevent the devastation from happening again. If the museum was bad, then it would deserve a low score but you're scoring it low because it is small and you prefer the other because it is bigger and can hold more. Do you think the museum is not able to teach people about history and what happened? Is this museum doing it's job? Is it telling the story of what happened in a way that shows us what happened in those dark days? Is the museum allowing us to be a part of history so we can put ourselves in the shoes of the people who were treated so horribly and then murdered. Does it allow us to have a good understanding of what those millions of people went through? If the answer is yes, than it deserves a higher score. because it is smaller and can't hold the bigger objects, it makes this museum not as worthy... It's like saying Disneyland isn;t good because Disney World is much bigger and has more things, but if you rate Disneyland on it's own merits it deserves a high score! I think that anology is much closer to what we are discussing than a croissant. I would hate to think that by you scoring this museum, low it might stop someone from visiting it and benefiting from that visit... For me the museum did its job. It made me think and feel things, I felt so much that I cried and by me learning so much that I did not already know the museum did it's job and did it very well. I just don't see your point

It is smaller. I have been to both, and they are both worthwhile. I highly recommend this museum.